New Article from The Iskandar Complex Hernia Center Clarifies the Difference Between Minimally Invasive and Robotic Hernia Repair

Waxahachie, TX – January 15, 2026 – PRESSADVANTAGE –

A newly released article titled “Is Minimally Invasive Hernia Repair the Same as Robotic Hernia Repair?” from The Iskandar Complex Hernia Center provides a clear explanation of the relationship between robotic and other minimally invasive hernia repair techniques. With many patients uncertain about the distinctions between laparoscopic, robotic, and endoscopic approaches, the article aims to eliminate confusion and support informed decision-making around surgical options. The center’s founder and renowned surgeon, Dr. Mazen Iskandar, shares insights into how each technique works, their differences in visualization and precision, and which types of hernias may benefit from each method.

Minimally invasive hernia repair typically refers to surgical techniques that reduce trauma to the abdominal wall using small incisions and specialized instruments. The two main approaches in this category are laparoscopic and robotic repair. While both reduce tissue disruption and allow faster recovery than traditional open surgery, they are not identical. Laparoscopic repair involves the surgeon operating with long instruments while viewing a 2D screen, whereas robotic repair uses a console and robotic arms to deliver 3D visualization and enhanced instrument articulation. Both approaches are widely used across the United States and can support strong outcomes when performed by experienced surgeons.

Dr. Iskandar explains that robotic hernia repair is particularly valuable in certain complex scenarios. Because robotic technology allows for greater control, improved visualization, and precision in mesh placement, it is often preferred for large ventral hernias, recurrent hernias, or situations involving scar tissue from previous surgeries. The article emphasizes that for straightforward cases like simple inguinal hernias, robotic and laparoscopic methods offer similar outcomes in terms of recurrence and recovery, provided that the surgeon is skilled in the chosen technique.

According to the article, some practical differences also exist between the two methods. Robotic surgery can require more time in the operating room due to the setup of equipment, and it may incur higher hospital costs depending on available resources. However, research indicates that the long-term results—including durability of repair and return-to-function—are comparable when patient-specific factors are appropriately considered. The key determinant in successful outcomes is not the method itself but the surgeon’s expertise and ability to tailor the approach to the patient’s individual needs.

Dr. Iskandar underscores the importance of evaluating several variables when deciding between minimally invasive options. These include the type and complexity of the hernia, the presence of scar tissue or prior surgeries, the patient’s anatomy, and the availability of robotic systems at the treatment facility. Patient goals, such as minimizing downtime or reducing postoperative discomfort, also factor into the discussion. The article encourages patients to ask informed questions and rely on the surgeon’s experience to guide them toward the safest and most effective repair method.

The article also describes a less common but important technique known as endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair. This method avoids entering the abdominal cavity and is often used for groin-based hernias such as inguinal hernias. Like laparoscopic and robotic repairs, it falls under the umbrella of minimally invasive surgery and supports faster recovery compared to open repair. When performed appropriately, all three techniques can offer meaningful advantages in reducing pain, infection risk, and recovery time.

The Iskandar Complex Hernia Center focuses exclusively on hernia surgery and advanced abdominal wall reconstruction, providing expert evaluation and repair options for patients with simple to complex hernias. Dr. Iskandar brings extensive experience in both laparoscopic and robotic techniques and helps each patient navigate the pros and cons of the available approaches. The new article highlights the importance of individualized care, noting that the optimal solution depends on both the characteristics of the hernia and the clinical judgment of a skilled surgeon.

For more information about The Iskandar Complex Hernia Center or to access the full article, visit The Iskandar Complex Hernia Center. Reporters interested in speaking with Dr. Iskandar regarding the distinctions between hernia repair techniques or the broader state of minimally invasive surgery may contact the center’s media team through the website.

###

For more information about The Iskandar Complex Hernia Center, contact the company here:

The Iskandar Complex Hernia Center
Mazen Iskandar
info@iskandarcenter.com
The Iskandar Complex Hernia Center
2460 I-35E Suite 310-B
Waxahachie, TX 75165